ok
Direktori : /opt/alt/python37/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/numpy/doc/ |
Current File : //opt/alt/python37/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/numpy/doc/misc.py |
""" ============= Miscellaneous ============= IEEE 754 Floating Point Special Values -------------------------------------- Special values defined in numpy: nan, inf, NaNs can be used as a poor-man's mask (if you don't care what the original value was) Note: cannot use equality to test NaNs. E.g.: :: >>> myarr = np.array([1., 0., np.nan, 3.]) >>> np.where(myarr == np.nan) >>> np.nan == np.nan # is always False! Use special numpy functions instead. False >>> myarr[myarr == np.nan] = 0. # doesn't work >>> myarr array([ 1., 0., NaN, 3.]) >>> myarr[np.isnan(myarr)] = 0. # use this instead find >>> myarr array([ 1., 0., 0., 3.]) Other related special value functions: :: isinf(): True if value is inf isfinite(): True if not nan or inf nan_to_num(): Map nan to 0, inf to max float, -inf to min float The following corresponds to the usual functions except that nans are excluded from the results: :: nansum() nanmax() nanmin() nanargmax() nanargmin() >>> x = np.arange(10.) >>> x[3] = np.nan >>> x.sum() nan >>> np.nansum(x) 42.0 How numpy handles numerical exceptions -------------------------------------- The default is to ``'warn'`` for ``invalid``, ``divide``, and ``overflow`` and ``'ignore'`` for ``underflow``. But this can be changed, and it can be set individually for different kinds of exceptions. The different behaviors are: - 'ignore' : Take no action when the exception occurs. - 'warn' : Print a `RuntimeWarning` (via the Python `warnings` module). - 'raise' : Raise a `FloatingPointError`. - 'call' : Call a function specified using the `seterrcall` function. - 'print' : Print a warning directly to ``stdout``. - 'log' : Record error in a Log object specified by `seterrcall`. These behaviors can be set for all kinds of errors or specific ones: - all : apply to all numeric exceptions - invalid : when NaNs are generated - divide : divide by zero (for integers as well!) - overflow : floating point overflows - underflow : floating point underflows Note that integer divide-by-zero is handled by the same machinery. These behaviors are set on a per-thread basis. Examples -------- :: >>> oldsettings = np.seterr(all='warn') >>> np.zeros(5,dtype=np.float32)/0. invalid value encountered in divide >>> j = np.seterr(under='ignore') >>> np.array([1.e-100])**10 >>> j = np.seterr(invalid='raise') >>> np.sqrt(np.array([-1.])) FloatingPointError: invalid value encountered in sqrt >>> def errorhandler(errstr, errflag): ... print("saw stupid error!") >>> np.seterrcall(errorhandler) <function err_handler at 0x...> >>> j = np.seterr(all='call') >>> np.zeros(5, dtype=np.int32)/0 FloatingPointError: invalid value encountered in divide saw stupid error! >>> j = np.seterr(**oldsettings) # restore previous ... # error-handling settings Interfacing to C ---------------- Only a survey of the choices. Little detail on how each works. 1) Bare metal, wrap your own C-code manually. - Plusses: - Efficient - No dependencies on other tools - Minuses: - Lots of learning overhead: - need to learn basics of Python C API - need to learn basics of numpy C API - need to learn how to handle reference counting and love it. - Reference counting often difficult to get right. - getting it wrong leads to memory leaks, and worse, segfaults - API will change for Python 3.0! 2) Cython - Plusses: - avoid learning C API's - no dealing with reference counting - can code in pseudo python and generate C code - can also interface to existing C code - should shield you from changes to Python C api - has become the de-facto standard within the scientific Python community - fast indexing support for arrays - Minuses: - Can write code in non-standard form which may become obsolete - Not as flexible as manual wrapping 3) ctypes - Plusses: - part of Python standard library - good for interfacing to existing sharable libraries, particularly Windows DLLs - avoids API/reference counting issues - good numpy support: arrays have all these in their ctypes attribute: :: a.ctypes.data a.ctypes.get_strides a.ctypes.data_as a.ctypes.shape a.ctypes.get_as_parameter a.ctypes.shape_as a.ctypes.get_data a.ctypes.strides a.ctypes.get_shape a.ctypes.strides_as - Minuses: - can't use for writing code to be turned into C extensions, only a wrapper tool. 4) SWIG (automatic wrapper generator) - Plusses: - around a long time - multiple scripting language support - C++ support - Good for wrapping large (many functions) existing C libraries - Minuses: - generates lots of code between Python and the C code - can cause performance problems that are nearly impossible to optimize out - interface files can be hard to write - doesn't necessarily avoid reference counting issues or needing to know API's 5) scipy.weave - Plusses: - can turn many numpy expressions into C code - dynamic compiling and loading of generated C code - can embed pure C code in Python module and have weave extract, generate interfaces and compile, etc. - Minuses: - Future very uncertain: it's the only part of Scipy not ported to Python 3 and is effectively deprecated in favor of Cython. 6) Psyco - Plusses: - Turns pure python into efficient machine code through jit-like optimizations - very fast when it optimizes well - Minuses: - Only on intel (windows?) - Doesn't do much for numpy? Interfacing to Fortran: ----------------------- The clear choice to wrap Fortran code is `f2py <http://docs.scipy.org/doc/numpy-dev/f2py/>`_. Pyfort is an older alternative, but not supported any longer. Fwrap is a newer project that looked promising but isn't being developed any longer. Interfacing to C++: ------------------- 1) Cython 2) CXX 3) Boost.python 4) SWIG 5) SIP (used mainly in PyQT) """ from __future__ import division, absolute_import, print_function